June 24, 2025
Dear Friends and Family,
On September 13, 2022, as part of the COVID series I wrote: this segment reveals there are several treatments that if utilized in the early stages of infection would have been effective – hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), ivermectin, and hydrogen peroxide nebulization. Multiple sources suggest that if they were effective, vaccine development would have been delayed at significant cost and profit because that would negate the utilization of the Emergency Use Authorization provision of U.S. law. HCQ had been approved for use by the FDA for 65 years with billions of applications worldwide. Countless physicians prescribed it for COVID infections with positive effects. Yet, the FDA banned its use for COVID. Why? Clinical trials were ordered to verify its use and suddenly the trials showed it had little benefit and some side effects. As the excerpts report, the trials were manipulated.
That led to a strategy of isolating individuals to prevent the virus’s spread – social distancing, masking, lockdowns, school closures and restrictions on assembly – awaiting a vaccine. The result was well over one million deaths within two years, a record that puts us as one of the worst countries in the world.
This segment contains excerpts from two books -- PsyWar (2024) and The WAR on Ivermectin (2023) – that provides additional information on the manipulation of results and banning of the use of HCQ and Ivermectin for Covid.
The failure of Health and Human Services – 65,000 civil servants -- to accept responsibility for effectively evaluating readily available, low-cost therapeutics that were shown to be highly effective in third world countries is to me is unconscionable, shameful and makes my blood boil even today. Read the excerpts and see if you agree. I wonder the effect on the death statistics if HHS had embraced HCQ and Ivermectin early on in the pandemic.
Also, I have attached an article by the Vigilant Fox detailing Senator Ron Johnson’s Senate hearing on COVID-19 Vaccine injuries held on May 21, 2025. It, for me, is a continuation of revealing the Deep State’s impact on our health care system. On a positive note, it was announced on May 28, 2025, that the CDC has stopped recommending COVID vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women which I presume is the fallout of the Senate hearing.
Happy Learning,
Harley
Dear Friends and Family,
On September 13, 2022, as part of the COVID series I wrote: this segment reveals there are several treatments that if utilized in the early stages of infection would have been effective – hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), ivermectin, and hydrogen peroxide nebulization. Multiple sources suggest that if they were effective, vaccine development would have been delayed at significant cost and profit because that would negate the utilization of the Emergency Use Authorization provision of U.S. law. HCQ had been approved for use by the FDA for 65 years with billions of applications worldwide. Countless physicians prescribed it for COVID infections with positive effects. Yet, the FDA banned its use for COVID. Why? Clinical trials were ordered to verify its use and suddenly the trials showed it had little benefit and some side effects. As the excerpts report, the trials were manipulated.
That led to a strategy of isolating individuals to prevent the virus’s spread – social distancing, masking, lockdowns, school closures and restrictions on assembly – awaiting a vaccine. The result was well over one million deaths within two years, a record that puts us as one of the worst countries in the world.
This segment contains excerpts from two books -- PsyWar (2024) and The WAR on Ivermectin (2023) – that provides additional information on the manipulation of results and banning of the use of HCQ and Ivermectin for Covid.
The failure of Health and Human Services – 65,000 civil servants -- to accept responsibility for effectively evaluating readily available, low-cost therapeutics that were shown to be highly effective in third world countries is to me is unconscionable, shameful and makes my blood boil even today. Read the excerpts and see if you agree. I wonder the effect on the death statistics if HHS had embraced HCQ and Ivermectin early on in the pandemic.
Also, I have attached an article by the Vigilant Fox detailing Senator Ron Johnson’s Senate hearing on COVID-19 Vaccine injuries held on May 21, 2025. It, for me, is a continuation of revealing the Deep State’s impact on our health care system. On a positive note, it was announced on May 28, 2025, that the CDC has stopped recommending COVID vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women which I presume is the fallout of the Senate hearing.
Happy Learning,
Harley
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH – SEGMENT 15
THE DEEP STATE in HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) -EXCERPTS
BACKGROUND: As laid out in an editorial in the British Medical Journal, medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies that compete for market share but are effectively united in their efforts to expand that market. The short-term stimulus to biomedical research because of privatization has been celebrated by free market champions, but the unintended, long-term consequences for medicine have been severe. Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community. Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators.
The US government, particularly NIH and its institutes, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), awards a significant amount of grants and contracts won by most academic institutions in the U.S. Hence, senior government employees also can determine what research is conducted and who is funded to conduct that research. Although there is an illusion of peer review in the selection of grants, it is actually the agency or institute and ultimately the director who makes the final decision. The revolving door between government and industry, particularly the pharmaceutical and biotech industry, ensures that conflict of interest issues abound.
US government employees also control the narrative. Take, for example, the use of the media that the CDC and the FDA used to control the narrative about early treatment for COVID-19. By now, we should all know about the corruption in the early clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine. On the basis of these faked studies, one of the safest drugs in the world was recommended not to be used in an outpatient setting in the midst of an ongoing pandemic. This faked study convinced the administrative state that a vaccine was the only viable solution to fight COVID-19. Even though the said vaccine was experimental and, at the time, still in development. In the case of ivermectin, the US government use propaganda to control the use of ivermectin by such tactics as calling it unfit for human use and labeling it as a “horse dewormer.” The gray and black propaganda campaign against ivermectin, which has an excellent safety record, overwhelmed mainstream media airwaves.
Regulators (ergo, the FDA) receive funding from industry and use industry-funded and performed trials to approve drugs. In most cases, the FDA regulators do not review the raw data. What confidence do we have in a system where drug companies are permitted to “mark their own homework” rather than having their products tested by independent experts as part of the regulatory system? Unconcerned governments and captured regulators are unlikely to initiate necessary changes to remove research from industry altogether and clean up publishing models that depend on reprint, advertising, and sponsorship revenue.
Finally, pharmaceutical companies pay off mainstream news outlets in the form of advertising. Advertising dollars are spent to suppress the press from critically investigating pharmaceutical companies. This strategy became very apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. The practice of currying favor of investigatory agents even happens at the level of academic journals. Big Pharma and biotech companies both advertise and buy vast numbers of article reprints as a way of garnering favor of big-name scientific journals, and the corporations running the journals are dependent on this funding mechanism to remain solvent. These are corrupting influences on the medical and scientific fields that must end. Congress needs to step in to pass laws to abolish these practices.
Source: PsyWar by Robert W. Malone, MD, MS and Jill G. Malone, PhD (2024).
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS TO THE PANDEMIC: Hydroxychloroquine: From the moment President Trump first spoke about a promising drug called hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the defamation campaign was swift and furious. By the summer of 2020, HCQ was trending. A group of physicians calling themselves America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) held a press conference on the steps of the United States Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Led by Dr. Simone Gold, a tireless medical freedom fighter, the “White Coat Summit” warned of the ineffectiveness of masks, social distancing, and lockdowns, and spoke of the promise of repurposing medications – in particular, HCQ – in early treatment.
The medical community had been holding its collective breath waiting for what would be considered large-enough, proper RCTs of a number of interventions that were being used from early on in the pandemic, including HCQ, convalescent plasma, and antiviral interferon. Enter Dr. David Boulware, an infectious disease specialist from the University of Minnesota. Boulware conducted one of the first RCTs on HCQ, which he published in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in August 2020. His was one of only two substantive papers used by the FDA to justify withdrawing the Emergency Use Authorization for HCQ. The importance of this paper’s impact on the pandemic cannot be overstated, both in terms of saving lives and in shaping how repurposed drugs would become marginalized.
David Wiseman, a research bio-scientist at Johnson & Johnson reached out to me after he found a statistically significant correlation between time to treatment and efficacy in HCQ which he sent to Boulware. A medical blunder with massive implications had occurred. The Boulware paper failed to account for the shipping time of the drug to study subjects. This is critically important if the goal is for HCQ to be a sort of “morning after” pill. A revised set of data shifted Boulware’s published 17% estimate of HCQ efficacy to a potentially pandemic-changing, statistically significant 42%, if the drug was delivered up to three days after exposure. Boulware confessed that he had been unaware of how his database had defined certain time periods or events. There was no way to know at the time, but Boulware, would go on to serve as a major enemy asset in the later war on ivermectin. By the end of 2022, Boulware was one of the main “go-to” media commentators on ivermectin given he was a coauthor of multiple large ivermectin studies, even though they had design and conduct deficiencies that would make his HCQ trial shenanigans pale in comparison.
Ivermectin: By June 2020, enough patients had been treated to conduct a study comparing those treated with ivermectin versus those who had not been given the antiparasitic drug. The identified control group whose characteristics matched as closely as possible to the treated group in terms of age, sex, and severity of illness, something called “propensity matching,” a highly valued statistical and study technique with results that, on average, matched those of RCTs. What they found was “truly astonishing’; a 47% reduction in death among all treated patients, and an incredible 73% reduction in death among the most severe. It was unprecedented.
Ivermectin has been called a “wonder drug” for decades due to its effectiveness and safety in treating a range of infections in humans and animals, and because it has nearly rid the world of two of its most disfiguring and devastating disease river blindness and elephantiasis. The drug provided more than 57 million treatments in its first twenty years alone – and prevented untold suffering and countless deaths around the world.
I testified in a Senate Homeland Security Hearing for Senator Ron Johnson. The first hearing triggered a widespread smear campaign against Senator Johnson, HCQ, and me and my fellow panel members. The second hearing was two weeks later; I was up. In hindsight, it’s clear to me that I didn’t fully understand how threatening the ivermectin testimonies would be to pharma and the Covid establishment, who were poised to roll out their beloved “vaccines” and had their own lineup of worthless antivirals like Paxlovid and Lagevrio waiting in the wings. Prior to my testimony I was asked to submit a written statement. My favorite paragraph from my written statement is this:
THE DEEP STATE in HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (HHS) -EXCERPTS
BACKGROUND: As laid out in an editorial in the British Medical Journal, medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies that compete for market share but are effectively united in their efforts to expand that market. The short-term stimulus to biomedical research because of privatization has been celebrated by free market champions, but the unintended, long-term consequences for medicine have been severe. Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community. Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators.
The US government, particularly NIH and its institutes, such as the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), awards a significant amount of grants and contracts won by most academic institutions in the U.S. Hence, senior government employees also can determine what research is conducted and who is funded to conduct that research. Although there is an illusion of peer review in the selection of grants, it is actually the agency or institute and ultimately the director who makes the final decision. The revolving door between government and industry, particularly the pharmaceutical and biotech industry, ensures that conflict of interest issues abound.
US government employees also control the narrative. Take, for example, the use of the media that the CDC and the FDA used to control the narrative about early treatment for COVID-19. By now, we should all know about the corruption in the early clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine. On the basis of these faked studies, one of the safest drugs in the world was recommended not to be used in an outpatient setting in the midst of an ongoing pandemic. This faked study convinced the administrative state that a vaccine was the only viable solution to fight COVID-19. Even though the said vaccine was experimental and, at the time, still in development. In the case of ivermectin, the US government use propaganda to control the use of ivermectin by such tactics as calling it unfit for human use and labeling it as a “horse dewormer.” The gray and black propaganda campaign against ivermectin, which has an excellent safety record, overwhelmed mainstream media airwaves.
Regulators (ergo, the FDA) receive funding from industry and use industry-funded and performed trials to approve drugs. In most cases, the FDA regulators do not review the raw data. What confidence do we have in a system where drug companies are permitted to “mark their own homework” rather than having their products tested by independent experts as part of the regulatory system? Unconcerned governments and captured regulators are unlikely to initiate necessary changes to remove research from industry altogether and clean up publishing models that depend on reprint, advertising, and sponsorship revenue.
Finally, pharmaceutical companies pay off mainstream news outlets in the form of advertising. Advertising dollars are spent to suppress the press from critically investigating pharmaceutical companies. This strategy became very apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. The practice of currying favor of investigatory agents even happens at the level of academic journals. Big Pharma and biotech companies both advertise and buy vast numbers of article reprints as a way of garnering favor of big-name scientific journals, and the corporations running the journals are dependent on this funding mechanism to remain solvent. These are corrupting influences on the medical and scientific fields that must end. Congress needs to step in to pass laws to abolish these practices.
Source: PsyWar by Robert W. Malone, MD, MS and Jill G. Malone, PhD (2024).
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS TO THE PANDEMIC: Hydroxychloroquine: From the moment President Trump first spoke about a promising drug called hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the defamation campaign was swift and furious. By the summer of 2020, HCQ was trending. A group of physicians calling themselves America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) held a press conference on the steps of the United States Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Led by Dr. Simone Gold, a tireless medical freedom fighter, the “White Coat Summit” warned of the ineffectiveness of masks, social distancing, and lockdowns, and spoke of the promise of repurposing medications – in particular, HCQ – in early treatment.
The medical community had been holding its collective breath waiting for what would be considered large-enough, proper RCTs of a number of interventions that were being used from early on in the pandemic, including HCQ, convalescent plasma, and antiviral interferon. Enter Dr. David Boulware, an infectious disease specialist from the University of Minnesota. Boulware conducted one of the first RCTs on HCQ, which he published in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in August 2020. His was one of only two substantive papers used by the FDA to justify withdrawing the Emergency Use Authorization for HCQ. The importance of this paper’s impact on the pandemic cannot be overstated, both in terms of saving lives and in shaping how repurposed drugs would become marginalized.
David Wiseman, a research bio-scientist at Johnson & Johnson reached out to me after he found a statistically significant correlation between time to treatment and efficacy in HCQ which he sent to Boulware. A medical blunder with massive implications had occurred. The Boulware paper failed to account for the shipping time of the drug to study subjects. This is critically important if the goal is for HCQ to be a sort of “morning after” pill. A revised set of data shifted Boulware’s published 17% estimate of HCQ efficacy to a potentially pandemic-changing, statistically significant 42%, if the drug was delivered up to three days after exposure. Boulware confessed that he had been unaware of how his database had defined certain time periods or events. There was no way to know at the time, but Boulware, would go on to serve as a major enemy asset in the later war on ivermectin. By the end of 2022, Boulware was one of the main “go-to” media commentators on ivermectin given he was a coauthor of multiple large ivermectin studies, even though they had design and conduct deficiencies that would make his HCQ trial shenanigans pale in comparison.
Ivermectin: By June 2020, enough patients had been treated to conduct a study comparing those treated with ivermectin versus those who had not been given the antiparasitic drug. The identified control group whose characteristics matched as closely as possible to the treated group in terms of age, sex, and severity of illness, something called “propensity matching,” a highly valued statistical and study technique with results that, on average, matched those of RCTs. What they found was “truly astonishing’; a 47% reduction in death among all treated patients, and an incredible 73% reduction in death among the most severe. It was unprecedented.
Ivermectin has been called a “wonder drug” for decades due to its effectiveness and safety in treating a range of infections in humans and animals, and because it has nearly rid the world of two of its most disfiguring and devastating disease river blindness and elephantiasis. The drug provided more than 57 million treatments in its first twenty years alone – and prevented untold suffering and countless deaths around the world.
I testified in a Senate Homeland Security Hearing for Senator Ron Johnson. The first hearing triggered a widespread smear campaign against Senator Johnson, HCQ, and me and my fellow panel members. The second hearing was two weeks later; I was up. In hindsight, it’s clear to me that I didn’t fully understand how threatening the ivermectin testimonies would be to pharma and the Covid establishment, who were poised to roll out their beloved “vaccines” and had their own lineup of worthless antivirals like Paxlovid and Lagevrio waiting in the wings. Prior to my testimony I was asked to submit a written statement. My favorite paragraph from my written statement is this:
Numerous studies have consistently reported large magnitudes of benefits in all the disease’s phases but with the most significant public health impact in the prevention of transmission. On this compelling evidence, we recommend Ivermectin’s administration for both prophylaxis in all high-risk patients as well as in the early and late phases of the disease. If this were to occur nationally, we predict that, like in many of the regions shown above, the pandemic will end, the economy can re-open, social interactions and activity can resume, and life can normalize. The expected impact will allow our nation to grow and focus on the multitude of other pressing problems facing our society.
As we are all sadly aware, that is not even close to what happened. Ranking committee member Senator Gary Peters opened the hearing with a statement that accused Chairman Ron Johnson and our entire penal of expert witnesses of “playing politics with public health” and “promoting unproven therapeutics.” And then that spineless shill – the only Democrat committee member who even bothered to show up at all – walked out of the hearing. The ignorance and disrespect was shocking. I was so enraged I couldn’t even think.
Since that testimony, every one of us at the FLCCC (Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance)– along with every treatment provider on the planet using HCQ or ivermectin – has had our credibility attacked. No matter how many thousands of patients we treat with near perfect results, our successes are ignored, maligned, or outright dismissed. The evidence I presented in that testimony was both enormous and irrefutable. It would take a few more months for me to accept the reality that no amount of incontrovertible, rock-solid science would ever be considered as long as it was inconvenient to Big Pharma’s plans or profitability
As of this writing, more than twenty-six months have passed since that senate hearing. The evidence base to support ivermectin is now so massive, it’s genuinely incomprehensible that both the media and our so-called health agencies continue to ignore it. It’s no longer a debatable fact that treating Covid with ivermectin leads to highly statistically significant improvements in time to viral clearance, time to clinical recovery, hospitalizations, and death. And yet the medicine is not part of any official Covid protocol in the advanced health economies of the world, and if you asked people on the street what they know about ivermectin, I’m betting at least six out of ten would use the words “horse dewormer” in their reply. As of this writing, there are ninety-five studies from 1,023 scientists including 134,554 patients from twenty-seven countries that show ivermectin’s efficacy. Further, there are numerous published studies of the effects of widespread ivermectin distribution programs from Paraguay, Argentina. Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and Peru, all of which reported astonishing success in decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In other words, ivermectin is one of the most “proven” medicines in history and also one of the most studied.
Ignoring evidence is merely one tactic that’s been used to discredit ivermectin. In fact, there’s been a systematic and sophisticated smear campaign like something out of a spy novel. At its heart is the very thing that medical freedom fighters have been fighting since the beginning of the pandemic: disinformation.
DISCREDITING REPURPOSING DRUGS: To be clear, Ivermectin wasn’t the first casualty of the World War Covid. The same tactics had been used against HCQ in 2020 and had they not, HCQ would have been deployed at the onset of the pandemic and save even more lives. The closest and best description of that war I’ve discovered was featured in Robert R. Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci, a brilliant, expertly researched, and undeniably incriminating takedown of “America’s Doctor.” Kennedy wrote: “From the outset, Hydroxychloroquine and other therapeutics posed an existential threat to Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates $48 billion Covid vaccine project, and particularly to their vanity drug remdesivir, in which Gates has a large stake. Under the federal law, new vaccine and medicines cannot qualify for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) if any existing FCA-approved drug proves effective against the same malady.
In other words, if HCQ or ivermectin had been recognized as a viable treatment, the massive cash cow that was the global Covid-19 vaccine campaign would have been slaughtered on the spot. Keep in mind that HCQ and ivermectin not only threatened the vaccine campaign, but also the massive and exploding competitive market for other pricey Big Pharma products like remdesivir, Paxlovid, molnupiravir, and monoclonal antibodies. Never in history had two generic, repurposed medicines threatened a marketplace of such a colossal size. Fauci and his minions, using the captured US media, eliminated both as an option in the U.S. Every advanced health economy has a Fauci-like figure who did the same.
To understand how disinformation plays out on the field, it’s crucial to know a bit about the players. To be clear, the pharmaceutical industry had a well-documented criminal history long before Covid. Companies including Pfizer, Johnson& Johnson, AstraZeneca, Mercik, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and dozens more have paid tens of billions of dollars in both criminal and civil fines for violations including the failure to disclose safety data, bribing physicians and scientists. Medicare fraud, poor manufacturing practices. And making false and misleading safety statements. Our friend Pfizer sits at number two on the largest-ever-criminal-settlement list, shelling our $2.3 billion alone in fines for off-label promotion and paying kickbacks. What I’m saying is Big Pharma isn’t exactly a trustworthy bunch.
As the largest lobbyist on Capitol Hill by miles. Pharma spends three times what the entire oil and gas industry does promoting their agendas. If you divide the total amount spent on lobbying ($356.6 million) by the number of members of Congress (535), it averages out to $665,000 per member. Note these figures refer to just a single year (2021) of spending. “The crimes are so widespread, repetitive, and varied that the inescapable conclusion is that they are committed deliberately because crime pays. The companies see the fines as a marketing expense and carry on with their illegal activities, as if nothing happened.
COUNTERFEIT TRIALS: As if this writing, there have been six major ivermectin trials in Covid that have been published in high-impact medical journals. Each of the “Big Six” somehow found that ivermectin was not useful in preventing or treating Covid. Each of these six large, “high quality” trials were only performed by study investigators drowning in Big Pharma conflicts, but was, unsurprisingly, brazen fraudulent in their design and conduct. And while every single trial showed ivermectin to be superior to placebo, none of the benefits reached the hallowed level of “statistical significance.”
One of the trialists’ main weapons, which escaped the attention of the entire world, is that most of the studies were conducted in South American countries where ivermectin was not only available over the counter, but its efficacy was increasingly recognized by word of mouth, through social media, and even via local media and government communications. There is abundant evidence that the control groups in South America were not only taking ivermectin but also that the Pharma-conflicted study investigators were taking little to no actions to identify those taking ivermectin and to exclude them from participation. Which makes it very, very hard to prove that ivermectin is more effective than ivermectin. Further, with both groups getting ivermectin, there were very few hospitalizations or deaths, the result of which is what is called an “underpowered trial.” When a study is underpowered, most differences between treatment groups will not reach statistical significance.
The most brazen example of fraud came from our very own, esteemed National Institutes of Health (NIH). Two years into the pandemic, they finally decided to fund a “proper” trial, to see, once and for all, whether ivermectin effectively treats Covid. They pulled every shady study design trick. Blatantly Pharma-conflicted investigators, the lowest weight limit to dosing yet, an impossibly short duration of treatment, delayed delivery of ivermectin because they shuttered the study on weekends, insanely late enrollment, studying only mildly ill patients, you name it. The irony is … they failed to find ivermectin inferior. In fact, they found a highly statistically significant benefit in their primary outcome.
As the world came under attack by a novel and highly transmissible respiratory virus, the medical journals had a critical, life-saving responsibility to publish any and all studies of treatments that were even potentially effective in preventing the disease. They not only abdicated their primary duty but were influenced to violate it, repeatedly and egregiously. Millions have died as a result of their willful and concerted actions.
CENSORING: We now know that the Department of Heath and Human Services (HHS) paid media outlets $1 billion dollars to promote the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and combat “vaccine hesitancy.” Further, the Biden administration had admitted to working directly with social media companies and encouraging them to be proactive in combating “misinformation.” Weber Shandwick, worked simultaneously for Moderna, Pfizer, and the CDC, the latter of which paid up to $55.2 million for PR services, money which was paid in part using Covid emergency funds.
YouTube was one of the earliest and most aggressive censors. In May of 2020, the streaming platform published a “COVID-19 medical misinformation policy” which expressly banned any mention of ivermectin or HCQ in the context of Covid. Big Tech and mainstream media believe they are smarter than medical doctors who have devoted their lives to science and use their skills to save lives. They had decided there is only one medical viewpoint allowed, and it is the viewpoint dictated by government agencies.
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn followed suit. You literally had the government and Pharma pressuring all the mainstream and social media giants to remove mentions or discussions of any and all early treatments. The recently (spring 2023) released “Twitter Files” shed eye-popping light on just how scandalous Covid censorship was. Among the most egregious offenses: Any “true content which might promote vaccine hesitancy,” “purported links between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and cancer,” or the closure of a school due to reports of post-vaccine illness was considered “actionable content,” meaning it could be censored or removed.
The CDC foundation is ostensibly an independent nonprofit organization established by the US Congress to support the CDC, making bribery via massive donations just-barely this side of legal. The foundation “provides funding and resources to the CDC to support a wide range of public health initiatives. Their donors and sponsors -conveniently listed right on their website – include, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance (hi, Bill!), Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Pay Pal, among others. In case you’re missing the giant, flashing, neon point here: the deep-pocketed, pro-vaccine, anti-ivermectin players can and do “donate” massive amounts of money to a government-sponsored “nonprofit foundation” aimed at improving public health. So yeah, the United States of Pharma is rallying its best Twitter and TikTok assets to destroy anyone like me, the FLCCC, or any of the heroes highlighted in these pages, and pretty clear they have no intention of letting up.
SCIENCE BECOMES POLITICALLY POLARIZED: While the team that made up FLCCC was almost uniformly liberal Democrats at the beginning of Covid, we had zero political agenda. Our mission was to develop treatment protocols for all aspects of the disease and to disseminate that guidance to the public. Yet for some reason, the only media interested in any of us, or our cause, came from the conservative side of the political spectrum. Meanwhile, the left was publishing endless hit jobs on us, our message, and our guidance. The New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, CNN, Rachel Maddow, and the entire flock of late-night talk show hosts seemed to be reading from the same script. Because our message deviated from that narrative, we were depicted not as scholarly and objective authorities on Covid science, but as doctors with a political or profit agenda. The systematic smear campaign was unprecedented. Political ideology had nothing whatsoever to do with my medical practice, yet it wasn’t long before I was being called a “right-wing, fringe doctor.” The propaganda campaign was relentless, running on every newspaper, TV show, radio station and social media platform simultaneously. The problem (for them) was that people still wanted ivermectin. Prescriptions in the US were off the charts – literally.
THE MIRACULOUS SUCCESS OF UTTAR PRADESH:
Uttar Pradesh (UP) is a state in northern India that is roughly the same size as the UK and has a population of 231 million people. If UP were a country it would be the sixth most populous in the world. UP quickly adopted hydroxychloroquine for use in prevention of Covid for all its health care workers as well as household contacts of all laboratory confirmed cases. Then, in August 2020, UP switched their protocol to ivermectin after an “experiment” in UP’s Agra, a city of 1.6 million. Prior to the spring 2021 Delta wave, UP had only a tiny number of cases, despite massive testing (they ranked fifth in the world in this metric) and despite being one of the poorest states in India. By November, UP had the sixth lowest death rate in India. Two months later, deaths were virtually zero.
India was a mess, particularly the big cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Hospitals were overrun and running out of supplies, sparking reports of the collapse of city and regional health systems. Utter Predesh was not spared. They went from 300 cases a day on March 19th (out of 231 million people) to 2,589 just two weeks later and then to almost 40,000 by late July. Note that the United States would have loved to see “just” 40,000 cases a day. With millions of migrant workers bringing Delta into UP, the result was one of the highest infection rates in the world. Notably, despite this, their death rate was literally one of the lowest. I received an email from a surgeon and the owner of a hospital in India. His email noted the Indian government was finally allowing ivermectin for early home-care treatment.
“This is a GAME CHANGER decision for INDIA and even for the entire WORLD,” he wrote. “Ivermectin save India in 2020 after it got official permission in Uttar Pradesh. This led to control of Covid by October 2020. Now with the official acceptance of Ivermectin for Covid-19 we are sure that the steep spike will have an ABRUPT FALL in 2 weeks. It’s not a prediction, but a reality. Trust Ivermectin. It works on ALL VARIANTS of coronavirus. We BEG health agencies & mainstream media in other countries, NOT to give BAD PROGAGANDA to Ivermectin (a SAFE HUMAN drug for 33 years). Ivermectin is saving India.”
By the end of the summer, Covid was effectively eradicated in Uttar Pradesh, a feat I consider to be one of the greatest public health achievements in history. One of history’s most highly contagious, aerosol-transmitted viruses had essentially disappeared from within the borders of a massive state of 231 million. On September 10, the Hindustan Times reported jaw-dropping findings that should have made global headlines. Sixty-seven of UP’s seventy-five districts had not reported a new case in the previous 24 hours. (That would be like forty-four states in the US not reporting a new case at the same time). In thirty-three districts, there was not a single “active case.” In fact, in the entire state of 231 million people, there were only 199 active cases.
In contrast, Kerala, one of the two states in India that rejected the use of ivermectin, was reporting a 19.7% positivity rate at the time. This astonishing news should have been on the cover of every major newspaper across the world. It was akin to discovering another penicillin, and yet the media blackout was global. Once again, any mention of UP’s success was roundly and ludicrously attributed to the vaccines, even though by September 21, still only 10% of the country was fully vaccinated.
By the end of September 2021, most of India was out of the Covid woods due to abundant natural immunity and widespread use of ivermectin. To the naysayers and propagandists who are skeptical of the public health date from Uttar Pradesh in particular of India in general, similar programs were launched in Paraguay, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and Peru. Although none came close to the scope and scale of UP’s program, all saw astonishing success.
WRAP UP: The government has lost my trust – and not just with regard to medicine. Climate change, the war in Ukraine, oil shortages, a banking collapse – whatever the new “narrative” is, I’m inclined to suspect it’s usually and mostly false; willfully constructed not for the common good, but for the good of those who control the institutions of society. I will never again believe a word they say without verifying it myself through exhaustive investigation.
For the record, I still believe that the vast, overwhelming majority of people are good. And I don’t necessarily know who “they” are either; the evil forces responsible for the carnage I’ve seen. I certainly have a list of suspects; Big Pharma and Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab and the rest of the globalist brat pack are on there, but who is above them? The industrialists with more money than God?
Source: The WAR on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic by Dr. Pierre Kory with Jenna McCarthy (2023)
The unabbreviated version of the above can be found in the pdf document below.
Since that testimony, every one of us at the FLCCC (Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance)– along with every treatment provider on the planet using HCQ or ivermectin – has had our credibility attacked. No matter how many thousands of patients we treat with near perfect results, our successes are ignored, maligned, or outright dismissed. The evidence I presented in that testimony was both enormous and irrefutable. It would take a few more months for me to accept the reality that no amount of incontrovertible, rock-solid science would ever be considered as long as it was inconvenient to Big Pharma’s plans or profitability
As of this writing, more than twenty-six months have passed since that senate hearing. The evidence base to support ivermectin is now so massive, it’s genuinely incomprehensible that both the media and our so-called health agencies continue to ignore it. It’s no longer a debatable fact that treating Covid with ivermectin leads to highly statistically significant improvements in time to viral clearance, time to clinical recovery, hospitalizations, and death. And yet the medicine is not part of any official Covid protocol in the advanced health economies of the world, and if you asked people on the street what they know about ivermectin, I’m betting at least six out of ten would use the words “horse dewormer” in their reply. As of this writing, there are ninety-five studies from 1,023 scientists including 134,554 patients from twenty-seven countries that show ivermectin’s efficacy. Further, there are numerous published studies of the effects of widespread ivermectin distribution programs from Paraguay, Argentina. Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and Peru, all of which reported astonishing success in decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In other words, ivermectin is one of the most “proven” medicines in history and also one of the most studied.
Ignoring evidence is merely one tactic that’s been used to discredit ivermectin. In fact, there’s been a systematic and sophisticated smear campaign like something out of a spy novel. At its heart is the very thing that medical freedom fighters have been fighting since the beginning of the pandemic: disinformation.
DISCREDITING REPURPOSING DRUGS: To be clear, Ivermectin wasn’t the first casualty of the World War Covid. The same tactics had been used against HCQ in 2020 and had they not, HCQ would have been deployed at the onset of the pandemic and save even more lives. The closest and best description of that war I’ve discovered was featured in Robert R. Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci, a brilliant, expertly researched, and undeniably incriminating takedown of “America’s Doctor.” Kennedy wrote: “From the outset, Hydroxychloroquine and other therapeutics posed an existential threat to Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates $48 billion Covid vaccine project, and particularly to their vanity drug remdesivir, in which Gates has a large stake. Under the federal law, new vaccine and medicines cannot qualify for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) if any existing FCA-approved drug proves effective against the same malady.
In other words, if HCQ or ivermectin had been recognized as a viable treatment, the massive cash cow that was the global Covid-19 vaccine campaign would have been slaughtered on the spot. Keep in mind that HCQ and ivermectin not only threatened the vaccine campaign, but also the massive and exploding competitive market for other pricey Big Pharma products like remdesivir, Paxlovid, molnupiravir, and monoclonal antibodies. Never in history had two generic, repurposed medicines threatened a marketplace of such a colossal size. Fauci and his minions, using the captured US media, eliminated both as an option in the U.S. Every advanced health economy has a Fauci-like figure who did the same.
To understand how disinformation plays out on the field, it’s crucial to know a bit about the players. To be clear, the pharmaceutical industry had a well-documented criminal history long before Covid. Companies including Pfizer, Johnson& Johnson, AstraZeneca, Mercik, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, and dozens more have paid tens of billions of dollars in both criminal and civil fines for violations including the failure to disclose safety data, bribing physicians and scientists. Medicare fraud, poor manufacturing practices. And making false and misleading safety statements. Our friend Pfizer sits at number two on the largest-ever-criminal-settlement list, shelling our $2.3 billion alone in fines for off-label promotion and paying kickbacks. What I’m saying is Big Pharma isn’t exactly a trustworthy bunch.
As the largest lobbyist on Capitol Hill by miles. Pharma spends three times what the entire oil and gas industry does promoting their agendas. If you divide the total amount spent on lobbying ($356.6 million) by the number of members of Congress (535), it averages out to $665,000 per member. Note these figures refer to just a single year (2021) of spending. “The crimes are so widespread, repetitive, and varied that the inescapable conclusion is that they are committed deliberately because crime pays. The companies see the fines as a marketing expense and carry on with their illegal activities, as if nothing happened.
COUNTERFEIT TRIALS: As if this writing, there have been six major ivermectin trials in Covid that have been published in high-impact medical journals. Each of the “Big Six” somehow found that ivermectin was not useful in preventing or treating Covid. Each of these six large, “high quality” trials were only performed by study investigators drowning in Big Pharma conflicts, but was, unsurprisingly, brazen fraudulent in their design and conduct. And while every single trial showed ivermectin to be superior to placebo, none of the benefits reached the hallowed level of “statistical significance.”
One of the trialists’ main weapons, which escaped the attention of the entire world, is that most of the studies were conducted in South American countries where ivermectin was not only available over the counter, but its efficacy was increasingly recognized by word of mouth, through social media, and even via local media and government communications. There is abundant evidence that the control groups in South America were not only taking ivermectin but also that the Pharma-conflicted study investigators were taking little to no actions to identify those taking ivermectin and to exclude them from participation. Which makes it very, very hard to prove that ivermectin is more effective than ivermectin. Further, with both groups getting ivermectin, there were very few hospitalizations or deaths, the result of which is what is called an “underpowered trial.” When a study is underpowered, most differences between treatment groups will not reach statistical significance.
The most brazen example of fraud came from our very own, esteemed National Institutes of Health (NIH). Two years into the pandemic, they finally decided to fund a “proper” trial, to see, once and for all, whether ivermectin effectively treats Covid. They pulled every shady study design trick. Blatantly Pharma-conflicted investigators, the lowest weight limit to dosing yet, an impossibly short duration of treatment, delayed delivery of ivermectin because they shuttered the study on weekends, insanely late enrollment, studying only mildly ill patients, you name it. The irony is … they failed to find ivermectin inferior. In fact, they found a highly statistically significant benefit in their primary outcome.
As the world came under attack by a novel and highly transmissible respiratory virus, the medical journals had a critical, life-saving responsibility to publish any and all studies of treatments that were even potentially effective in preventing the disease. They not only abdicated their primary duty but were influenced to violate it, repeatedly and egregiously. Millions have died as a result of their willful and concerted actions.
CENSORING: We now know that the Department of Heath and Human Services (HHS) paid media outlets $1 billion dollars to promote the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and combat “vaccine hesitancy.” Further, the Biden administration had admitted to working directly with social media companies and encouraging them to be proactive in combating “misinformation.” Weber Shandwick, worked simultaneously for Moderna, Pfizer, and the CDC, the latter of which paid up to $55.2 million for PR services, money which was paid in part using Covid emergency funds.
YouTube was one of the earliest and most aggressive censors. In May of 2020, the streaming platform published a “COVID-19 medical misinformation policy” which expressly banned any mention of ivermectin or HCQ in the context of Covid. Big Tech and mainstream media believe they are smarter than medical doctors who have devoted their lives to science and use their skills to save lives. They had decided there is only one medical viewpoint allowed, and it is the viewpoint dictated by government agencies.
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn followed suit. You literally had the government and Pharma pressuring all the mainstream and social media giants to remove mentions or discussions of any and all early treatments. The recently (spring 2023) released “Twitter Files” shed eye-popping light on just how scandalous Covid censorship was. Among the most egregious offenses: Any “true content which might promote vaccine hesitancy,” “purported links between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and cancer,” or the closure of a school due to reports of post-vaccine illness was considered “actionable content,” meaning it could be censored or removed.
The CDC foundation is ostensibly an independent nonprofit organization established by the US Congress to support the CDC, making bribery via massive donations just-barely this side of legal. The foundation “provides funding and resources to the CDC to support a wide range of public health initiatives. Their donors and sponsors -conveniently listed right on their website – include, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance (hi, Bill!), Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Pay Pal, among others. In case you’re missing the giant, flashing, neon point here: the deep-pocketed, pro-vaccine, anti-ivermectin players can and do “donate” massive amounts of money to a government-sponsored “nonprofit foundation” aimed at improving public health. So yeah, the United States of Pharma is rallying its best Twitter and TikTok assets to destroy anyone like me, the FLCCC, or any of the heroes highlighted in these pages, and pretty clear they have no intention of letting up.
SCIENCE BECOMES POLITICALLY POLARIZED: While the team that made up FLCCC was almost uniformly liberal Democrats at the beginning of Covid, we had zero political agenda. Our mission was to develop treatment protocols for all aspects of the disease and to disseminate that guidance to the public. Yet for some reason, the only media interested in any of us, or our cause, came from the conservative side of the political spectrum. Meanwhile, the left was publishing endless hit jobs on us, our message, and our guidance. The New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, CNN, Rachel Maddow, and the entire flock of late-night talk show hosts seemed to be reading from the same script. Because our message deviated from that narrative, we were depicted not as scholarly and objective authorities on Covid science, but as doctors with a political or profit agenda. The systematic smear campaign was unprecedented. Political ideology had nothing whatsoever to do with my medical practice, yet it wasn’t long before I was being called a “right-wing, fringe doctor.” The propaganda campaign was relentless, running on every newspaper, TV show, radio station and social media platform simultaneously. The problem (for them) was that people still wanted ivermectin. Prescriptions in the US were off the charts – literally.
THE MIRACULOUS SUCCESS OF UTTAR PRADESH:
Uttar Pradesh (UP) is a state in northern India that is roughly the same size as the UK and has a population of 231 million people. If UP were a country it would be the sixth most populous in the world. UP quickly adopted hydroxychloroquine for use in prevention of Covid for all its health care workers as well as household contacts of all laboratory confirmed cases. Then, in August 2020, UP switched their protocol to ivermectin after an “experiment” in UP’s Agra, a city of 1.6 million. Prior to the spring 2021 Delta wave, UP had only a tiny number of cases, despite massive testing (they ranked fifth in the world in this metric) and despite being one of the poorest states in India. By November, UP had the sixth lowest death rate in India. Two months later, deaths were virtually zero.
India was a mess, particularly the big cities like Delhi and Mumbai. Hospitals were overrun and running out of supplies, sparking reports of the collapse of city and regional health systems. Utter Predesh was not spared. They went from 300 cases a day on March 19th (out of 231 million people) to 2,589 just two weeks later and then to almost 40,000 by late July. Note that the United States would have loved to see “just” 40,000 cases a day. With millions of migrant workers bringing Delta into UP, the result was one of the highest infection rates in the world. Notably, despite this, their death rate was literally one of the lowest. I received an email from a surgeon and the owner of a hospital in India. His email noted the Indian government was finally allowing ivermectin for early home-care treatment.
“This is a GAME CHANGER decision for INDIA and even for the entire WORLD,” he wrote. “Ivermectin save India in 2020 after it got official permission in Uttar Pradesh. This led to control of Covid by October 2020. Now with the official acceptance of Ivermectin for Covid-19 we are sure that the steep spike will have an ABRUPT FALL in 2 weeks. It’s not a prediction, but a reality. Trust Ivermectin. It works on ALL VARIANTS of coronavirus. We BEG health agencies & mainstream media in other countries, NOT to give BAD PROGAGANDA to Ivermectin (a SAFE HUMAN drug for 33 years). Ivermectin is saving India.”
By the end of the summer, Covid was effectively eradicated in Uttar Pradesh, a feat I consider to be one of the greatest public health achievements in history. One of history’s most highly contagious, aerosol-transmitted viruses had essentially disappeared from within the borders of a massive state of 231 million. On September 10, the Hindustan Times reported jaw-dropping findings that should have made global headlines. Sixty-seven of UP’s seventy-five districts had not reported a new case in the previous 24 hours. (That would be like forty-four states in the US not reporting a new case at the same time). In thirty-three districts, there was not a single “active case.” In fact, in the entire state of 231 million people, there were only 199 active cases.
In contrast, Kerala, one of the two states in India that rejected the use of ivermectin, was reporting a 19.7% positivity rate at the time. This astonishing news should have been on the cover of every major newspaper across the world. It was akin to discovering another penicillin, and yet the media blackout was global. Once again, any mention of UP’s success was roundly and ludicrously attributed to the vaccines, even though by September 21, still only 10% of the country was fully vaccinated.
By the end of September 2021, most of India was out of the Covid woods due to abundant natural immunity and widespread use of ivermectin. To the naysayers and propagandists who are skeptical of the public health date from Uttar Pradesh in particular of India in general, similar programs were launched in Paraguay, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, and Peru. Although none came close to the scope and scale of UP’s program, all saw astonishing success.
WRAP UP: The government has lost my trust – and not just with regard to medicine. Climate change, the war in Ukraine, oil shortages, a banking collapse – whatever the new “narrative” is, I’m inclined to suspect it’s usually and mostly false; willfully constructed not for the common good, but for the good of those who control the institutions of society. I will never again believe a word they say without verifying it myself through exhaustive investigation.
For the record, I still believe that the vast, overwhelming majority of people are good. And I don’t necessarily know who “they” are either; the evil forces responsible for the carnage I’ve seen. I certainly have a list of suspects; Big Pharma and Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab and the rest of the globalist brat pack are on there, but who is above them? The industrialists with more money than God?
Source: The WAR on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic by Dr. Pierre Kory with Jenna McCarthy (2023)
The unabbreviated version of the above can be found in the pdf document below.
| exec_15l_health_and_human_services_--_segment_15.pdf |
| exec_15_extra_hhs_and_covid_vaccines_--_segment_15.pdf |